Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholicism in Space: Houston, Do We Have a problem?
Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate 1964 Blog ^ | 3/25/15 | Mark Gray

Posted on 03/28/2015 11:13:51 AM PDT by marshmallow

Twin astronauts Mark and Scott Kelly (raised Catholic in an Irish-American family) are about to embark on an important scientific experiment on Friday. Scott Kelly will begin spending a year in space on the International Space Station (ISS) while his brother stays back here on earth as a control subject. NASA will be studying how extended time in space changes Scott relative to his brother Mark. Living for an extended time outside the gravity of earth and partially exposed to the radiation of space can impact one’s bones, heart, eyes, muscles, and who knows what else.

It’s probably important to start understanding and thinking more about living in space because frankly that is where the human future may be. At some point the Catholic Church will need to think about how people can “do” Catholicism in space. During the shuttle Endeavour mission STS-134 in March 2011, Mark Kelly was part of the crew on the ISS who spoke with Pope Benedict XVI. He told Kelly and the astronauts,

“Space exploration is a fascinating scientific adventure. I know you have been studying your equipment to further scientific research and to study radiation coming from outer space. But I think it is also an adventure of the human spirit. A powerful stimulus to reflect on the origins and on the destiny of the universe and humanity.”

Indeed the destiny of human beings is among the stars as our descendants will eventually need to get off this rock to survive (…if we don’t kill each other first). The sun is about to enter its mid-life crisis. At 4.6 billion years old it has more than a half-life to go. Well before then it is expected to get a bit brighter by about 10% in 1.1 billion years. That will begin to make life......

(Excerpt) Read more at nineteensixty-four.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; General Discusssion; Ministry/Outreach; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: Dutchboy88

All the “do’s” you list could be done in your head. Is there anything that Jesus asked his followers to do in the physical world, such as breaking bread together or going to church?

By the way, I don’t understand the dominos reference.


61 posted on 03/31/2015 9:22:40 AM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: edwinland; WVKayaker
"All the “do’s” you list could be done in your head. Is there anything that Jesus asked his followers to do in the physical world, such as breaking bread together or going to church?"

Nothing of any consequence. The real consequence is what He has done for us. Re-visit the remarks by WVKayaker and Rom. 8. The hermeneutic employed by Rome places great emphasis on Matt, Mark, Luke and John (commonly & mistakenly called the "Gospels"). But, the actual "gospel" for us Gentiles begins at the cross (Eph2). Check it out. Much of what Jesus taught is the Jewish Law. And, your gang won't do that...such as tear out an offending eye. Why don't you "do" that?

"By the way, I don’t understand the dominos reference."

Just me being smart-alecky. You know, the Romanist priests say stuff in Latin which sounds like, "(sing this at a higher pitch) I can play dominos better than you (now drop a couple notes down and sing) can." Sounds like Latin...sort of. I know...not funny.

But, the real point is that absolution, confession, and most of the other traditions of Romanism are not Scriptural. These traditions occupy the "do" that Catholics think of when they think of "doing" Christianity. Just as there was nothing for the thief on the cross to "do" to be fully rescued, there are no "requirements" left which must be fulfilled for a person to be rescued today.

62 posted on 03/31/2015 9:57:28 AM PDT by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Dutchboy88
. The hermeneutic employed by Rome places great emphasis on Matt, Mark, Luke and John (commonly & mistakenly called the "Gospels"). But, the actual "gospel" for us Gentiles begins at the cross (Eph2).

I'm curious about the use of the word "begin" in that context. Even without referring to the "Gospels" it would seem that for Paul, the good news begins in the incarnation and culminates in the resurrection. Hence:

Phil 2:7-8: but emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, being born in human likeness. And being found in human form, 8 he humbled himself and became obedient to the point of death— even death on a cross.

2 Corinthians 8:9: For you know the generous act of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, so that by his poverty you might become rich.

Romans 8:3-4 For God has done what the law, weakened by the flesh, could not do: by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and to deal with sin, he condemned sin in the flesh, 4 so that the just requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.

Galatians 4:4-6 But when the fullness of time had come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law, 5 in order to redeem those who were under the law, so that we might receive adoption as children. 6 And because you are children, God has sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts, crying, “Abba! Father!”

By the way, I read Ephesians 2 and didn't see anything that contradicts the passages included above. Also I did find this:

For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— 9 not by works, so that no one can boast. 10 For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.

Which would seem to suggest some "works" to do.

Now I get the dominoes reference Yes I should have figured that out. Actually I rather like gregorian chant because I find it quite beautifulo and moving, even if it were not also liturgical.

63 posted on 03/31/2015 2:19:34 PM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: edwinland
Ahhh, but you stopped reading in Eph. 2. "11 Therefore remember that formerly you, the Gentiles in the flesh, who are called " Uncircumcision" by the so-called "Circumcision," which is performed in the flesh by human hands - remember that you were at that time separate from Christ, excluded from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world. But now in Christ Jesus you who formerly were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ.

When were you, as a Gentile, brought near? Altogether now...at the Cross, when the blood flowed.

64 posted on 03/31/2015 2:37:10 PM PDT by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: edwinland
Further, go check any credible Greek NT and you will notice that the first four accounts say, "According to Matthew", "According to Mark", According to Luke", "According to John". It is the publishers (likely some catholic character, just like the monk who broke all the books/letters into chapters and verses...again, not original) who added the "Gospel according to..."

This error sets many reader upon a trail they do not belong...they are reading someone else's mail. Just as you likely do not believe the Prophet Isaiah is writing to a Gentile, what made you think Matthew was writing to a Gentile? Paul says, "I am writing to Gentile believers as the apostle sent to the Gentiles." Well, now, that really is to us. Read from there on BEFORE you look back. Then go re-read the entire Book with Gentile eyes looking over the shoulders of the First Group...the Jews.

65 posted on 03/31/2015 2:52:15 PM PDT by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Dutchboy88
I read that part. But if it means that the incarnation is not relevant for gentiles, why does Paul keep talking about the incarnation? It would seem that for Paul, the good news for the Gentile to whom he is writing begins in the incarnation and culminates in the resurrection. Hence:

Phil 2:7-8: but emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, being born in human likeness. And being found in human form, 8 he humbled himself and became obedient to the point of death— even death on a cross.

2 Corinthians 8:9: For you know the generous act of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, so that by his poverty you might become rich.

Romans 8:3-4 For God has done what the law, weakened by the flesh, could not do: by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and to deal with sin, he condemned sin in the flesh, 4 so that the just requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.

Galatians 4:4-6 But when the fullness of time had come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law, 5 in order to redeem those who were under the law, so that we might receive adoption as children. 6 And because you are children, God has sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts, crying, “Abba! Father!”

66 posted on 04/01/2015 8:47:12 AM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: edwinland

I’m pretty much done here. Jesus would have to be incarnated in order to provide solutions to our two most important problems: 1. our evil (which His sacrifice paid for vicariously). 2. our lack of righteousness (which His holy life covered us with). These solutions leave nothing left to “do” from a biblicist’s point of view.

I think you have made your point that you believe Jesus commands believing Gentiles to “do” things far beyond what I find in the Scriptures. Well, then, whatever you do, don’t become an astronaut...unless you can take with you the entourage that is required to fulfill your “do” list.


67 posted on 04/01/2015 9:57:51 AM PDT by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Dutchboy88
Yes I think we have a pretty clear understanding of each other's views, and our conversation has helped me think about my faith in light specifically of St. paul's exhortations to the gentiles.

From that I have become comfortable that in Paul's view the good news starts with the incarnation and that he did not think the incarnation was simply necessary to get to Jesus's holy life and then to the cross, but that the incarnation itself is a "generous act of our Lord Jesus Christ", "that though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor," and that generous act in which Jesus "emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, being born in human likeness" is good news indeed.

Further, I learned that specifically within Paul's exhortations to the gentiles I can find support for my belief that a full faith which is a gift of God's grace is not just in the mind but in the soul and the body too, "For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do." This helped me to understand Paul more squarely within the tradition laid out in Mark "Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength (ischus)."

68 posted on 04/01/2015 11:15:03 AM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: edwinland
""Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength (ischus).""

Actually, that too is part of the Law of Moses...if you should be so inclined to look. But, please, if you do, and come to settle on this being "Christian Living 101", then do not, under any circumstance, fail to include Matt. 5:48 in your efforts to follow the requirements...and let us know when you are satisfied with your success. Regards.

69 posted on 04/01/2015 11:44:40 AM PDT by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Dutchboy88
"Actually, that too is part of the Law of Moses"

That's why I quoted it. It's interesting that it's so consistent with what Paul says about us being "created in Christ Jesus to do good works". But maybe Paul wasn't talking about "Biblical Christianity?"

70 posted on 04/02/2015 7:05:55 AM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: edwinland
"But maybe Paul wasn't talking about "Biblical Christianity?""

For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law.

I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness can come through the Law, then Christ died needlessly.

This is the only thing I want to find out from you: did you receive the Spirit by something you did in Law or by hearing with faith?

For as many as are of the works of the Law are under a curse; for it is written 'cursed is everyone who does not abide by ALL THE THINGS WRITTEN in the Book of the LAW to PERFORM THEM.'

Therefore the Law has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith

And I testify again to every man who receives circumcision, that HE IS UNDER OBLIGATION TO KEEP the WHOLE LAW

Signed, Paul

If your eye offends...tear it out. Well?

This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent.

Signed, Jesus

71 posted on 04/02/2015 7:50:17 AM PDT by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Dutchboy88
"This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent."

How do you interpret that in light of this?

For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— 9 not by works, so that no one can boast. 10 For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.

72 posted on 04/02/2015 9:12:48 AM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: edwinland

The “works” that Paul refers to are those things which the astronaut gone for 20 years could easily do. But, apparently, not if he wants to be a good little catholic boy. Rome has a long “to do” list for anyone who wishes to stay in “good standing”.


73 posted on 04/02/2015 12:21:33 PM PDT by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson