Could you please explain then the errors found in the Clermont List c.300 A.D. (Acts of Paul, Revelation of Peter) and the even earlier Muratorian Fragment 180 A.D. (Revelation of Peter)?
The earliest available Codices and these two all contain books that neither Catholics, Protestants and Coptics believe to be inspired scripture.
God did not send down a note saying “Bind these books together, but not these books” and we can see the result.
No man has been able to reach the level of Absolute Being when compiling books to be bound together and we can see the result.
Yes, I believe in inspired scripture but no man or council has inspiration of compilation.
Simple. Throughout history there have been people who tried to make a buck by writing their own versions of the Bible.
Many of these so-called “ACTS of Whoever” and Gospels of Whatzis name” are exactly this.
Think of the modern book of mormon, Uranta, Ohasphe, Aquarian Gospel of Jesus Christ, and the 29th chapter of ACTs as examples.