To: MeganC
...and who died _for_her_ as well.
Were she sinless, she would have been in no need of a Savior.
4 posted on
03/23/2015 2:19:15 PM PDT by
ctdonath2
(Si vis pacem, para bellum.)
To: ctdonath2
Were she sinless, she would have been in no need of a Savior.
That's not true. Saving someone by prevention (e.g. preventing someone from accidentally shooting themselves) is "saving", just as saving someone by brilliant surgery (by removing the bullets which were threatening the life of the person who *did* accidentally shoot himself) is "saving".
6 posted on
03/23/2015 2:28:33 PM PDT by
paladinan
(Rule #1: There is a God. Rule #2: It isn't you.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson