[G Larry]

This is not an objective language translation.

This is a man with an agenda pretending language authority which is completely unsupported by any independent language analysis.

Continuing from the source:

“If St. Matthew wanted to distinguish “rocks” in the text, he would have most likely used lithos. As stated above, lithos could refer to a large rock, but it was more commonly used to denote a small stone. However, there is a third word St. Matthew could have used that always means small stone: psephos. It is used twice in Rev. 2:17 as “small stone” when Jesus says, “To him who conquers I will give some of the hidden manna, and I will give him a white stone, with a new name written on the stone which no one knows except him who receives it.” Here we have one Greek word that unlike lithos and petra always has a connotation of “small stone,” or “pebble.””

[HossB86]

This is a man with an agenda....

And the "sources" you quote do not have one?

Sheesh.

Hoss

[CynicalBear]

>>he would have most likely used lithos.<<

Now you're second guessing what the Holy Spirit inspired the authors to write?