I agree, but our basic source should be scripture
whatever we read, it has to agree with what the Bible plainly says.
Concerning Peter, Paul directly contradicts any claims that Peter was the apostle to the gentiles, even though Acts chapter 10 shows him being the first one to bring the gentiles into this, Paul plainly states Paul is the apostle to the Gentiles while Pete is the apostle to the Jews
To make a doctrine that is the opposite or contradictory..well, it might be what a person thinks, but it aint Biblical.
Concerning Peter, Paul directly contradicts any claims that Peter was the apostle to the gentiles, even though Acts chapter 10 shows him being the first one to bring the gentiles into this, Paul plainly states Paul is the apostle to the Gentiles while Pete is the apostle to the Jews
7 And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.
13 And after they had held their peace, James answered, saying, Men and brethren, hearken unto me:
14 Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name.
15 And to this agree the words of the prophets; as it is written,
Not necessarily disagreeing but many of the arguments that different Churches have does come from scripture, in a case such as this I would have to say we just should not argue about them.