It’s worse than that. The priest isn’t another Christ. Christ is being offered again at the command of the priest. And thanks to the doctrine of transubstantiation, it’s not a bloodless sacrifice.
Quote
It’s worse than that. The priest isn’t another Christ. Christ is being offered again at the command of the priest. And thanks to the doctrine of transubstantiation, it’s not a bloodless sacrifice.
Maybe the problem is Protestants accept the catholic church as having any standing with anything to do with the Son of God.
So their ‘worship’ of Jesus is criticized..
Maybe ‘anti’ really means what it says in my concordance when it gives a definition of ‘instead of’ or ‘in place of’
maybe catholics and Protestants have a different Jesus.
And if that,s the case, what Rome does to the substitute Christ n their mass shoudnt matter accept to bringing them from their Roman Jesus to the genuine Hebrew ‘Jesus’.
The one not born on December 25 or ‘raised’ on easter.. that’s Rome’s Jesus..