.
I did read back to where you asked the “question.”
RTZ claimed spiritual ancestry in the remnant, the few, not the many, as the catholic church, and all that have been spawned by its massive errors.
Corporations of men, such as the catholic church, and the various other similar but ‘protestant’ churches have no relationship to Yeshua’s remnant; they are of men, and worship men.
Who would want to be a part of them? They are all called out for destruction when Yeshua returns to Jerusalem. Only those that “come out of her” have any chance at salvation as he gathers his elect in the cloud.
Is this what you were talking about?
.
Sorta what I was talking about, but not that much. I’m questioning the existence of what was claimed to exist.
To RTZ further back it was: “Not a categorical description you claim existed, but specifically by name and history: the non-denominational ekklesia that you have some evidence existed continuously since the time of Christ.”
And even further back to CB: “Who are these non-denominational Christians for two-thousand years? What is their history - your shared non-denominational history.”
It’s about a claim by CB of the existence of a “gathering of Christians was called the ekklesia... consistent since the time of Christ” and asking for specifics of their existence “since the time of Christ,” names, location, places... historical evidence of those non-denoms you would claim as ancestors in belief and theology and practice - orthodoxy and orthopraxis according to those who hold this view.
It only applies to you if this view includes you of course...