It's no diversion. It is an example of how sola scriptura engenders confusion. You say the SBC is wrong; yet you both CB and the SBC claim the Bible as ultimate and sole authority.
Of course it's diversion. I'm talking about what scripture says not what the Baptists say scripture says. God said in scripture not to eat blood. Eating blood would have been a sin against that command. It also says Jesus never sinned. If the Jesus you serve ate blood He would be a sinner.
The catechism of the Catholic church isn't interpreted the same way by everyone. Catholics are all over the map on how THAT is to be interpreted, so the same charge can be laid that the RCC's feet.
Until every single Catholics agrees lockstep with the CCC, the CCC engenders confusion.