OMEGATOO!
You have stated on this thread...
“So by OT law, Jesus WAS a sinner.”
Do you intend to evade trying to justify such a blatantly erroneous (and blasphemous to Christians) statement? How can you expect to defend it with just your tagline promos?
Sincerely,
R2z
RESETTOZERO!
Of course I know that Jesus was not a sinner, but the Jewish leaders called Jesus a sinner and killed him because he didn’t follow the letter of their interpretation of the law. They were so immersed in their strict interpretations they were unable to open their eyes and see that Jesus was indeed God.
He also taught openly that His followers should eat His flesh and drink his blood. For anyone who was not God, teaching this would have been a direct violation of the law. But the OT prohibitions against blood were because the ‘blood is for the soul’, or taking the soul of whatever creature’s blood you consumed.
This is exactly the point of Communion as literal body and blood of Christ...becoming one with the body and soul of Christ. Jesus’ teaching this is not a violation of OT either, but its fulfillment, which is what we know Jesus to be.
Love, O2
>>>>tagline<<<<<<<
(the above reference to my tagline is independent of and not a substitution for any comments in the actual posts preceding. Thank you, The Management)