The president of the U.S. cannot divulge confidential information....if he divulges it, it is no longer confidential.
Jesus cannot violate any biblicaal law....if He does the act, it is no longer a violation ...see??
So you think He could have broken all the Old Testament laws and it would have been no violation?
John 8:55 and ye have not known Him, and I have known Him, and if I say that I have not known Him, I shall be like you -- speaking falsely; but I have known Him, and His word I keep;
John 8:46 Who of you doth convict me of sin? and if I speak truth, wherefore do ye not believe me?
The Pharisees knew eating blood was a sin. They would have convicted Him and the apostles.
Hebrews 4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.
They wouldn't have been able to say that if He had eaten blood since eating blood would have been a sin against the law.
1 Peter 2:22 Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth:
Jesus did not change the law nor did He break the law.
Jesus isn't violating the Law. The rcc is teaching a false doctrine.
Acts 15:28-29 For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us to lay upon you no greater burden than these essentials: 29that you abstain from things sacrificed to idols and from blood and from things strangled and from fornication; if you keep yourselves free from such things, you will do well. Farewell.”