Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur McGowan
Ok, I see what you are saying now. So with respect to:

And the requirement of CONTINENCE applies to married clerics as well as the unmarried.

Was this always Church teaching? Is there support for this in Catholic teaching before the Church decided on a predominantly unmarried clergy?

Also, are we to assume that those clergy that are/were married, are continent with their wives?

35 posted on 02/20/2015 2:39:56 AM PST by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: piusv
Was this always Church teaching? Is there support for this in Catholic teaching before the Church decided on a predominantly unmarried clergy?

Dr. Edward Peters answers these questions.

The tradition goes back to the apostles.

The scenario that is believed by many--that most priests were married for many centuries, and celibacy was "imposed" by fiat--is a myth.

You are no doubt familiar with the way Protestant controversialists will quote a council or Pope reaffirming a dogma (e.g., transubstantiation) in the 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th, or even a later century, and confidently announce that the Church "invented" the dogma at that late date. The same error has been made time and again regarding clerical celibacy.

39 posted on 02/20/2015 5:41:34 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson