Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasFreeper2009

You know, if this change was being considered by a true Catholic pope, I wouldn’t have a problem with it. After all, it is only a church discipline. However, this is just one more thing this man wishes to change. This is just one more thing the non-Catholic modernists wish to change.


13 posted on 02/19/2015 3:15:31 PM PST by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: piusv

Actually, it’s not just a matter of “discipline.”

Cf. the blog of Dr. Edward Peters on the subject of clerical continence.

First of all, it is necessary to get the terms right. Anyone who is unmarried is “celibate.” For some reason, the popular press never uses the term “continent,” always misusing the term “celibate” instead.

The tradition, going back to the Apostles, is that all men in Orders must be perpetually and perfectly continent—whether married or unmmarried.

Canon Law on this subject is clear, and is in perfect continuity over the centuries: All Deacons, Priests, and Bishops are bound to perpetual, perfect continence. The restoration of the permanent diaconate by Paul VI brought about NO CHANGE in Canon Law on this subject.

Far from being a “mere discipline,” the perpetual continence of all clerics is intimately bound up with the nuptial meaning of the Eucharistic Sacrifice and the Church’s Eucharistic Realism.

If Francis entertains fantasies of a married priesthood, then it’s just one more example of his uneducated, bull-in-a-china-shop approach to deep issues of Catholic theology.


16 posted on 02/19/2015 3:44:13 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: piusv

Benedict is the real pope.


21 posted on 02/19/2015 4:25:24 PM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson