Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan; Mrs. Don-o
Thanks for both of your replies.

Yes, I did not know of their association with Mark. What I was also alluding to was the Copt’s potentially Gnostic “Gospel of Thomas,” among other things:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Thomas

Mrs. Don-o, I am honored you took the time to respond to my post. You have a lovely heart.

My wife and I will keep you and your family in our prayers.

Please take appropriate care of yourself to heal as well as possible.

39 posted on 02/19/2015 3:08:48 PM PST by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMind; don-o
Thank you for your kind words.

As far as I know, neither the Copts nor any of the other "Oriental" or "non-Calcedonian" Orthodox Churches have ever accepted the spurious "Gospel of Thomas" into their canon, and the dissenters (if any) would have been shown the door quite firmly by Athanasius of Alexandria in the period just after the Council of Nicaea (early 300's).

That's Old Time Religion!

It was good enough for Athanasius
It was good enough for Athanasius
It was good enough for Athanasius
An' it's good enough for me!

Now back to my Beauty Sleep :o)

43 posted on 02/19/2015 5:02:04 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost. - Luke 19:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson