Others here understand me perfectly well.
What's the matter, professor?
Subtleties not your bag?
Things blow right past you, if they are not painfully simple?
Other than the last postscript as it were, concerning possible lurkers, I bracketed the entire affair with your own words, your own statements. Do you not understand the implications of your own words?
Packaged all together, rather than what is called a &*^$ sandwich, wherein the opening is all nicey-nicey, the bad news &*^$ is in the middle, ending with more nicey-nicey noise, I put the good stuff in the middle, the meat of the matters there, bracketed by your own words, and how those words of your own can be seen to support my own positions while refuting your own, and at the same time also be used to judge your own way of using this forum to harass those whom are perceived in some way as critics of RCC theology, attitude, or practice.
Each time I do such a thing, all of a sudden you seem to not understand (yet of course always include note of yet further insult of a personal nature towards my own self, as you do in most every comment/reply to those whom are so-called "protestant", of course)
If you are still experiencing difficulties in understanding me, try hitting the links, reading there to see who is saying what. I formatted them to open in new tab.