I hope you have the integrity to tell CB exactly who gave me the idea of using that to settle matters.
I notice that none of your cohorts came out of the woodwork to express objection the multiple times which you have used that, since.
What's holding them back?
Two sets of rules?
Meanwhile, previous to your own reaction to CB's mention of voodoo, he was "bringing something to the discussion" regardless of whether or not yourself, or anyone else (including myself) entirely agreed with him, or not.
Which would serve to show that CB had been operating under the conditional requirements of the "or else shut up", leaving your own usage of the "or else" to be superfluous.