Why bother? It’s the Protestant along with the Muslim-in-chief who sit on their high horses condemning the Catholic Church for so called atrocities that have been committed against the poor Muslims in the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition.
“I will not serve! Came out of the depravity of Luther. He could have been a great Saint in reforming the Catholic Church as did St. Francis of Assisi, But no, he rebelled and said “I will not serve and changed Bible verses to justify and serve his own purposes. (Judas).
Henry the VIII, I will not serve! Which introduced divorce and later Birth Control.
So tell me, who destroyed the FAMILY?
“I will not serve!”
It’s the Catholic who will have to explain to their fallen away brothers that there will be no Rapture. It will be the Catholic who will have to explain to their fallen away brothers that it’s not the end of the world.
It will be in Humility and Love that the Catholic will embrace with Love and Mercy their lost brothers and sisters who were deceived by the Ant-Christ because of their disobedience. “I Will Not Serve.”
St. Michael, “Who Is Like Unto God?”
I’m sorry, but you justify unto hate. For you are the rebellions ones.
You prefer not to look back to the Fathers of the Church but prefer the easy way out which is wide and met with no resistance.
I pity you.
It’s the Protestant along with the Muslim-in-chief who sit on their high horses condemning the Catholic Church for so called atrocities that have been committed against the poor Muslims in the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition.
What prots have ever condemned the Catholic church for so-called atrocities against the muslims?
And as far as calling them *so-called* atrocities, do you not consider burning someone at the stake with pages from the Bible as fuel an atrocity?
Do Catholics not think that that would qualify?
“I will not serve! Came out of the depravity of Luther. He could have been a great Saint in reforming the Catholic Church as did St. Francis of Assisi, But no, he rebelled and said “I will not serve and changed Bible verses to justify and serve his own purposes. (Judas).
The Catholic church ex-communicated him.
And did he ever say *I will not serve*? Can you point to the quote?
We look to Jesus. No need to look to man.
Another great Catholic historian in the making. LOL.
Oh, be assured such was not restricted to the Muslims, but Jews and Christians also were subject to her unScriptural use of the sword of men.
Yet which some RCs here commend, and i have little doubt would support us being burned today by their institution.
You prefer not to look back to the Fathers of the Church but prefer the easy way out which is wide and met with no resistance. I pity you.
Actually what the so-called Fathers of the Church say is not determinative of doctrine, even for Rome, which judges them more than they judge her.
Nor can Rome claim actual “unanimous consent” of the fathers?,
Instead, the veracity of RC doctrine and assurance of Truth for a RC rests upon the novel premise of perpetual magisterial infallibility, which is nowhere in Scripture or promised.
But Rome has presumed to infallibly declare she is and will be perpetually infallible whenever she speaks in accordance with her infallibly defined (scope and subject-based) formula, which renders her declaration that she is infallible, to be infallible, as well as all else she accordingly declares.
Contrary to how the church began.
Thus appeal to history or Scripture is basically superflous in this regard as they can only mean what Rome says they do in any conflict.