Replies

Would you please clarify that statement?

Are you really that dense? It should have been obvious.

There was another here who was complaining about "two sets of rules".

But yet again, for the second time you post to me;

If you feel things are one-sided, then speak to the Moderator.

That makes no sense to say to me in the context of this thread, but would make perfect sense to have addressed to the one who had said;

Two sets of Rules on FR.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/3252810/posts?page=262#262

If there was anything "one-sided" which one could conceivably "speak to Moderators about", would not that have to be those same moderator's themselves being "one sided"?

I have no real complaint in that area, though I do wonder how much longer we all must suffer those whom habitually break the rules.

As for myself having asked you a personal question, I should be understood that for someone here to ask a relatively new sign-up if they had been here before, has previously been set aside (by the religion forum moderator) as one of those types of questions which are understandable, thus allowable, (in theory) for there are those persons who were once banned, but then attempt to re-tread here. Some perhaps sign on with a different name for other reasons.

But the "two sets of rules" sort of whining complaint about this forum and it's moderators, is pretty much 100% Roman Catholic whining. It's long been a re-current meme around here...

It seems to me that by yourself asking me if I thought things were one-sided in some manner which a forum moderator could themselves do something to correct(?) you attempted to portray it as if I was joining in with that pitiful whining, and moaning and complaining -- about the forum management.

No, I do not believe there are two sets of rules being enforced by forum management.

But the other individual obviously does.

As for yet another kind of being one sided --- I will say to you, to direct any corrections you may have towards your own cohorts first, rather than myself --- while utilizing such as that provisional "if" word.

Your own doing so, as you did, when and where you did, needed to be directed to the one who was complaining about double-standards, not to me.

Is that sufficient clarification?