No, it's more like I was busting your assertions which you sadly enough mistake for "truth" .
As for the rest which you just wrote... I didn't bother to read it.
There would be no point in doing so, for being as it begins with multi-layered accusation & error, it's doubtful it will get any better.
Meanwhile, it has been yourself who has been all along (for the most part) evasive, while I myself am wearied of correcting your own compound errors -- as I have been doing all along...while you keep repeating the same things over and over, at times in slightly altered forms, but not returning to the same claims which had just been shot full of holes until after throwing up a wall of blather, seemingly is response to how the claims had just been challenged, before as I noted, yourself simply returning to the same 'ol same 'ol (which had just been shown to not be nearly as far-reachingly true enough, as that that would need to be, in order for your grab-bags of assertions to have much of any validity in the way which you need them to).
I prefer Irenaeus in his own words, not what curbside bloggers and internet cut-and-paste technicians think. Can’t have time to be drawn into this sophomoric stuff of Bible-folks who have never bothered to read Augustine, Aquinas, Newman, and Benedict who by the way are not bloggers but whose works are studied in yes, major universities. Oh, I know their scholarship don’t matter. We are all in a fog of chaos stranded on interstate highways. (sarc.)