Matthew 1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS (Iésous): for he shall save his people from their sins. Iésous - Definition: Jesus; the Greek form of Joshua; Jesus, son of Eliezer; Jesus, surnamed Justus.
Luke 3:29 the son of Joshua (Iésous), the son of Eliezer, the son of Jorim, the son of Matthat, the son of Levi,
Now explain to us how the entire New Testament we have today in the Greek is corrupted and it doesn't really say to call Him Iésous. Tell us how the sacred name cult has "corrected" the erroneous documentation we have in the Greek. Can you do that with documentation from ancient manuscripts? Or are you using that Hebrew roots cult nonsense to reverse engineer the words of the New Testament to cast doubt?
Cynical, you just can’t get it through that everything you were ever taught about the savior of the world has a greco roman latin bent to it..
And not just a greco roman latin bent, but a roman catholic bent..
His name, the day Rome says is his birthday, the day Rome tells you He died, the day Rome tells you He was raised. Those aren’t just catholic things.. those are christian things.. and those christian things are nothing but traditions..
All birthed from Rome...
You have to blame modern translators for putting two ‘Joshua’ verses in the new testament where there were none as far back as 1599.
Acts 7:45 and Hebrews 4:8 in my 1599 bible still says Jesus in those two places’,
But every other bible I have shows Joshua has replaced those two originla Jesus verses..
And that has nothing to do with translating Greek/Latin to English..
That has everything to do with screwing up two verses and making it possiible to have some scrub like me question the very precious greco roman latin name for Rome’s savior.. and have that same scrub wonder why the other 900 plus verses couldn’t be changed from Jesus to Joshua of translators deemed that an appropriate name for two Jesus verses.
If one ever gets to the realization that Rome’s savior is a counterfeit and there isn’t another Jesus or another mary for protestants, that protestants share in her abominations, it may make them sick...or angry....
It isn’t the name that is just an issue.. it is everything that is associated with that name... and everything associated with the name Jesus begins in Rome..
Unless protestants have been boycotting rome’s december 25 and rome’s good Friday and rome’s easter Sunday and nobody told us..
That sort of messes up the whole christian calendar if those days have o meaning..
I guess people could reject Rome’s December 25, Rome’s good Friday and Rome’s easter Sunday and be called christian.. they certainly wouldn’t be called a Roman Catholic if they rejected so much of what Rome teaches and preaches..
How much of Rome do you follow? You may get sick if you studied it.. I have studied it.. and that is why Rome is exactly what the first reformers said Rome is..
And why I don’t accept Rome having anything to do with the Genuine Messiah of Israel..
She is just responsible for counterfeiting Him.. you and protestants can’t say the same because it is that counterfeit that you have your faith in..