[CynicalBear]

>>It has been both said and suggested that the child to be born is not the Second person of the Trinity.<<

I have not seen anyone make that claim. Could you please point out where you saw that?

[rwa265]

>>It has been both said and suggested that the child to be born is not the Second person of the Trinity.<<

I have not seen anyone make that claim. Could you please point out where you saw that?

---

Please refer to your post 1717

I asked: “So how can it be that Mary did not conceive and give birth to the Second person of the Trinity”?

You responded: “Because the second person of the trinity pre-dated Mary by at least a couple of years.”

There have been other posts, as well.