Your comment; “Do you see any exceptions in that statement? It’s preposterous to think that the apostles sent a letter to all the churches to tell them not to eat blood but then have them sit down and drink blood.”
Then why did the Apostles continue the Mass and the Eucharist and give the “Body and Blood of Jesus” to Catholics. And this has continued for 2000 years.
So you do not see any difference between the “Body and Blood” of Jesus and animal blood?
You say that Jesus is a sinner based on the Last Supper and that Jesus and the Apostles consumed His Body and Blood. And for His instructions to do this in memory of me.
The apostles knew it was not the physical body and blood just as the Jews understood that the Seder lamb was not the physical original lamb of Passover. The apostles understood that it was a spiritual remembrance rather than a physical presence.
>>So you do not see any difference between the Body and Blood of Jesus and animal blood?<<
The blood of all sacrifices was to be "spilled on the ground" as it was when Jesus was sacrificed on the cross. Commanded never to be eaten or drank.
>>You say that Jesus is a sinner based on the Last Supper and that Jesus and the Apostles consumed His Body and Blood.<<
Especially for Jesus and the apostles as they were still under the old law at that time.