For starters, whoever wrote that article does not seem capable of distinguishing between symbols and reality. For example, when St. Paul said the following, he was not saying he was literally up on the cross with Jesus Christ during His crucifixion, but only "crucified with Him" in a symbolic manner of speaking.
I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me; and the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. Galatians 2:20Any mother whose child is crucified right there in front of the mother, is also "up there on the cross with their child" (although not literally), and every astute and honest person realizes that they are not up there literally (and those pictures of symbols you posted of Mary and the Baby Jesus on a cross are just that: pictures of symbols, and it really should not be difficult for anybody to figure that out).
That type of analysis applies to all the pictures and erroneous points in your post.
Another clear example is the photo you have labeled with the following:
"Mary sitting in the place of God on the Ark of the Covenant, St. Stanislaus Kostka, Chicago"
=============================================================
No, that label assertion is a completely false assertion. In fact, that photo is of an iconic "monstrance" called "Our Lady of the Sign Ark of Mercy", where the Sacramental Presence of God in the Blessed Sacrament is lovingly placed for Adoration (as you can see in the picture), and that iconic monstrance is demonstrating how Mary is the "Ark of the New Covenant", who was chosen by God to hold the special Presence of God (Jesus Christ) inside her body.
God willed His special Presence to be in the old "Ark of the Covenant" of the "Children of Israel", and God also willed His special Presence to be inside of Mary as well, making her the "Ark of the New Covenant". (That was God who willed that Mary hold God's Presence in a uniquely special way like she did, and to denigrate that Holy action of God shown to that one solitary human being favored by God named "Mary", is to denigrate God.)
(To learn more about those important matters, carefully read the following sources, starting with reading the first one on youtube.)
LOL Catholics do that all the time. They think eating the word is actually literal.
Jeremiah 15:16 Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O LORD God of hosts.
Ezekiel 3:3 And he said unto me, Son of man, cause thy belly to eat, and fill thy bowels with this roll that I give thee. Then did I eat it; and it was in my mouth as honey for sweetness.
John 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
And Catholics say "I did eat the flesh".