Same kind of reasoning that Catholics use about the assumption of Mary. Since there's no record of her death, it means that she didn't die.
Funny how Catholics accept it when it favors them.
You have completely misstated what I have said in the past.
I have never argued from the absence of a record of Mary’s death to her not dying.
I argued from the total absence of relics to her assumption.
The total absence of relics is totally out-of-character for the early Christians. They kept relics of the apostles, martyrs, and many other people. The bones of 15,000 Roman martyrs are in the pillars around the altar in St. Peter’s.
The absence of a record of Mary’d death proves nothing. The absence of any relics of her body demands an explanation.