[CynicalBear]

You have been shown often and in detail how Kecharitomene can NOT be shown to mean “full of grace”. You claim to be here to learn yet repeat that nonsense after having been conclusively shown it to be error. I’m doubting your sincerity as to your claim to be searching for truth. It appears the propagation of the Catholic Church errors is more in line with your purpose.

[Olog-hai]

Do not know why you pinged me, but the Strong’s dictionary does not seem to be in error.

[Mrs. Don-o]

All untrue. And it's so easy to do a FR search and show it to be untrue. That's what's so puzzling about it.

I would cut off this whole correspondence as unproductive and conducive to uncharitable thoughts, except I keep thinking there are lurkers out there who are still reading; and so for their sake, though by nature inadequate to the task, I like to clarify the truths of the faith when I can.

So I can thank you, in a way, for providing the ongoing opportunity for me to hee-haw, bray and balk and bear the regular beatings, in order to provide the occasional word of wisdom. AMDG.

[RnMomof7]

You have been shown often and in detail how Kecharitomene can NOT be shown to mean “full of grace”. You claim to be here to learn yet repeat that nonsense after having been conclusively shown it to be error. I’m doubting your sincerity as to your claim to be searching for truth. It appears the propagation of the Catholic Church errors is more in line with your purpose.

That is one of the reasons they quickly deny greek as the original language.. it does not suit their purposes

The truth is Romes "teaching arm " the magisteium had NEVER produced an "infallible " commentary on the scriptures". In fact they have only interpreted a handful of verses (to bolster the their doctrine of course ) So in truth Catholics make their own personal interpretation when they "interpret" scripture ..and they are as fallible as anyone else when they do it