No, you are responding to your own assumptions of what I am saying in this thread and to some I never said. I’m not interested in continuing a dialogue with you.
Well it’s up to you, of course, if you don’t want to continue the discussion, though I’d rather not part on unpleasant terms.
But I dispute the parting-shot charge you’ve made against me. I don’t see any such “responses to my own assumptions of what you said” - as you claim. It’s possible I misunderstood things you said, of course. But no one has prevented you from posting a reply to correct me.
What I have responded to are the arguments you’ve made - arguments which fit neither the Scriptures nor rational examination (eis, for instance), and which might lead people astray, just as they perhaps have done to you.
Sometimes false doctrine is spread with malicious intent, other times by careless study, or haughtiness, or simple ignorance and blindness. But no matter the cause, disciples of Jesus have a duty to expose and refute such false doctrine, and to help those who have been misled to find and follow His truth.