Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ravenwolf

It’s just a faulty way of looking at the Bible. There’s no reason to pit any Scripture over any other Scripture. When you do that you destroy the unity of the Word. Every word Paul wrote was inspired by the Lord. And every word in the Old Testament was inspired by Him, too. When you read the Bible you are reading the words of God on the printed page. He used human authors, but He inspired every bit of it. If that’s not true, there’s no reason to believe any of it. If that’s not true, the Bible is just another book by men.

Initially I was thinking you might be a mainline Protestant, but now I’m guessing you’re Catholic.


38 posted on 01/09/2015 5:44:19 PM PST by .45 Long Colt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: .45 Long Colt

If that’s not true, there’s no reason to believe any of it. If that’s not true,


I believe my question was, did Paul consider what he wrote to be scripture or was he referring to the scripture which was already available?

Why make this out to be something it is not?

Initially I was thinking you might be a mainline Protestant, but now I’m guessing you’re Catholic.>>>>>>>>

If you want to make it personal, it can be a two way street.


42 posted on 01/09/2015 9:06:15 PM PST by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson