Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN
You make lots of false assumptions.

I don't recall making any assumptions, could you clarify or elaborate?

Why? Does it help you to support your self-righteous 'agnosticism'?

I have re-read my comments and don't see any thing that is "self righteous". Could you clarify or elaborate?

First, the very term 'infinity' has many different uses.

The dictionary gives 7, most of them concern a quantity without end.

Last, you again expose the agenda of your most recent little foray at FR by using the term 'infinities' in a temporal sense.

Absolutely not! I used it in the spacial sense. A temporal infinity is correctly called an eternity.

I have been told that all Christians agree that "god" is 1) Omnipotent- all powerful

2) Eternal his duration has no beginning or end.

3) Infinite his length, breadth, and thickness, has no limit.

On the other hand there have been three theories postulated about the universe. It is either expanding, contracting or static. No matter which one you believe the length, breadth, and thickness can be measured.

When I used the term separate I was referring to god's personhood. I did not want it to be confused with the Sabellius belief of modalism. I may not be certain of god's existence, but I am familiar with the way he has been described over the years by any number of groups.

Using your term:God manifests as three different individualities,.

that would present you with 3 different infinities.

All I have done is ask if the existence of god can be proven. I did not ask in a self righteous way or in an antagonistic way. If you think I did than perhaps it says more about you than me.

141 posted on 01/15/2015 4:42:03 PM PST by Thales Miletus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: Thales Miletus
"All I have done is ask if the existence of god can be proven." And I have asked 'in what context' is a proof for God's existence to be framed such that you will not play jello on the wall games with a reply, as you did in the post to which I have reluctantly responded?

ya know what, never mind. I have concluded that the game is what you are about, not a proof to satisfy your behavior mechanism, your soul. Perhaps you can get someone else to indulge you, I do not have sufficient respect for you at this juncture to spend any more time even reading your drek.

144 posted on 01/15/2015 5:00:51 PM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

To: Thales Miletus; MHGinTN; Alamo-Girl; metmom; marron; hosepipe; YHAOS; xzins; thouworm
A temporal infinity is correctly called an eternity.

Correctly? By whose definition?

It seems pretty clear to me by now that there is no such thing as a "temporal infinity." This is a mangling of terms that conflates two different orders of magnitude.

FWIW.

149 posted on 01/16/2015 10:22:09 AM PST by betty boop (Say good-bye to mathematical logic if you wish to preserve your relations with concrete realities!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson