[BlueDragon]

Thanks, but I responded to that already in a recent post!

You had made it out to be that others here must respond to your own demands for information.

What I was telling you is that it has been covered already, which makes your own "it's about time" type of comment many years too late.

But you say you had already "responded" saying -- what else -- that most of us here did not know already?

As far as I can tell, what you said --- I myself pointed out years ago.

In other words, remember, as far as this forum goes, there are conversations here which have been going on for a dozen years or more -- and you are still rather "new" here.

[Grateful2God]

I believe that, especially for us who haven't been here very long, if a picture such as that one is posted, it is common courtesy to the reader, and fairness to the subjects, to state what and whom it depicts, as well as its source. If one can call it up that quickly, it should not be a problem for the poster to do so. Once I had the links, I was able to put the scene in context, and include key phrases which had been omitted.

Thank you!