I don’t look for God in the gaps. I look for any reason that there is order in the universe. I don’t see a reason.
Well then it would appear that one has reasoned one’s self out of any kind of defensible position.
All things are oftentimes neither a simple as initially imagined nor as complicated as our superior reasoning often tends to lead us.
Do you take that you can perceive no reason as proof of a supreme being? If so, that is the very definition of the “god in the gaps” fallacy. BTW I don’t capitalize “god” as it isn’t definitive of any specific deity. When referencing the Christian God, I do capitalize.