Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: millegan

From what I understand, the early Church took the canon of the Old Testament from what the Jews had at the time of Christ, which included Maccabees. Later, the Jews removed it (4th Century?) and Luther removed a bit more. Luther even wanted to remove the Book of Revelation, but was prevented from doing so.


7 posted on 12/20/2014 1:55:09 PM PST by Slyfox (To put on the mind of George Washington read ALL of Deuteronomy 28, then read his Farewell Address)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Slyfox

Yes, the Jewish bible had these books at the time if Christ. They then removed them.


8 posted on 12/20/2014 2:03:08 PM PST by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Slyfox; millegan
From what I understand, the early Church took the canon of the Old Testament from what the Jews had at the time of Christ, which included Maccabees. Later, the Jews removed it (4th Century?) and Luther removed a bit more. Luther even wanted to remove the Book of Revelation, but was prevented from doing so.

That is incorrect. The Jewish "canon" never included the Apocryphal books. There were historical writings collected by some but they were NEVER considered as equal to the Divinely-inspired and recognized Old Testament books. Also, Luther didn't remove ANY books from his German translation of the Bible. He included those books in a section between the Old and New Testaments just as had been done centuries before (i.e., by Jerome). You can read about that here Luther and the Canon and The Apocrypha, the Septuagint and the Canon.

19 posted on 12/20/2014 8:30:56 PM PST by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson