To: NYer
In Defense of the Immaculate Conception: Part 2 there is really no need to defend the dogma...it is and always will be considered an infallible truth by the Catholic Church which is, of course, the true seat of Christianity...
16 posted on
12/11/2014 5:31:07 PM PST by
terycarl
(common sense prevails over all)
To: terycarl; Gamecock; metmom; daniel1212; BlueDragon
there is really no need to defend the dogma...Does that mean that we can look forward to the cessation of these pointless, indefensible threads?
20 posted on
12/11/2014 7:40:37 PM PST by
Alex Murphy
("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
To: terycarl
there is really no need to defend the dogma...it is and always will be considered an infallible truth by the Catholic Church which is, of course, the true seat of Christianity... No, this dogma was not ALWAYS believed - no Apostle ever taught it, not even John, who cared for Mary after Christ was crucified. It developed over a long time and didn't become an "infallible truth" until the nineteenth century!
27 posted on
12/11/2014 9:37:15 PM PST by
boatbums
(God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson