Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Kolokotronis

It wasn’t always that way. Pre-Vatican II schismatics were not allowed to receive Catholic sacraments. This is just another example of how New Church deviates from Traditional Catholicism.

And that has always been my concern in this thread. It wasn’t meant to get into an argument or debate with you.


49 posted on 12/12/2014 8:45:21 AM PST by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: piusv

I in all honesty haven’t looked at our exchange as a debate or an argument. I was simply curious about your understanding.

“Pre-Vatican II schismatics were not allowed to receive Catholic sacraments.”

Latins still are not allowed to receive sacraments in the Orthodox Church precisely because they are schismatics, but not because they are not Catholic. It has been observed that the Latin Church these days looks at allowing me, for example, to receive communion as a “means towards unity” while we look at such reception by me, or you for that matter were it allowed by us, as a false symbol of a unity which does not yet exist.


50 posted on 12/12/2014 8:59:25 AM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson