Replies

Wow, I do believe you could hang on this the rest of your life. lol I first mentioned that it could be relative to population about 250 posts ago. I guess you missed it.

LOL! Oh, honey, I have plenty of other things to occupy my time than your incoherent theology regarding the end-times remnant. You may have mentioned a "relative to population" rationalization earlier, but then you went right back to your assertion of ONLY 7000 and even expressed hope you would be among them! I could go back over this thread and quote the number of times you insisted a finite number of 7000 - even when others said it would be far MORE than that - then admitted it could be more only to go right back to stating it was 7000 again, but I DO have a life! I'm sure you'd like nothing more than for me to just drop it, but you shouldn't expect to state something and not have to defend yourself against a challenge. This IS the Religion Forum after all.

Here's a hint...if you misspeak, simply admit it. Don't double down. It only looks like desperation.

LOL! Oh, honey, I have plenty of other things to occupy my time than your incoherent theology regarding the end-times remnant. You may have mentioned a "relative to population" rationalization earlier, but then you went right back to your assertion of ONLY 7000 and even expressed hope you would be among them! I could go back over this thread and quote the number of times you insisted a finite number of 7000 - even when others said it would be far MORE than that - then admitted it could be more only to go right back to stating it was 7000 again, but I DO have a life! I'm sure you'd like nothing more than for me to just drop it, but you shouldn't expect to state something and not have to defend yourself against a challenge. This IS the Religion Forum after all. Here's a hint...if you misspeak, simply admit it. Don't double down. It only looks like desperation.

The 7000 is an identifier. I don't know what else to tell you.