Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: piusv
If you're going to criticize papal involvement in ecumenical prayer and discussion meetings, you'll have to dedicate your red pen to the histories of Popes John XIII, Paul VI, John Paul II and Benedict XVI as well, because they all participated in or convened similar meetings.

It's strange that you find this regrettable. The Humanum conference (LINK), which I think ends tomorrow, was a huge interreligious forum reasserting the complementarity of male and female, contributing to the theological doctrine that marriage is for male and female ONLY, and that it forms a durable bond which is the foundation of human personalty (in the raising of children by father and mother) as well as the foundation of human civilization.

Here's the strongest affirmation of traditional marriage ethic possible. The shared affirmation by Protestants, Orthodox and Jews clearly underlines the fact that this ethic is rooted, not in some peculiarly Catholic interpretation, but in Natural Law: that which reason and good will can discern about what is required for human flourishing.

David Quinn, director of the IONA institute (Irish organization in defense of traditional Catholic doctrines on sex, gender, marriage and family) said, "The conference is obviously an extremely major international gathering about the importance of marriage between a man and a woman." "It's probably the most significant gathering of its kind to date that's been organized by the Church, and specifically by the CDF."

You're not finding this --- the strong affirmation of male/female, husband/wife, father/mother ---- trumpeted in the media now, are you? Of course not. It is marked OMIT as far as they are concerned: DELETE-DELETE-DELETE. Because the media are working on their Narrative, and this is not part of their favored Francis story line. Don't you get that?

Upcoming is another HUGE interreligious meeting: the World Meeting of Families (Philadelphia 2015). Archbishop Chaput, sponsoring the meeting (LINK), said they're not likely to even bring up so-called "gay" "marriage," divorced-and-remarried Communion controversies and so forth, because they were there to affirm traditional marriage and deal with other challenges to marriage such as unemployment, addiction, disabilities, and the damaging effects of divorce.

This traditionalist aspect of the Meeting of Families --- the largest such meeting, probably, in the history of the world --- is not even on the media's radar. Is it on yours?

46 posted on 11/19/2014 8:23:28 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o
If you're going to criticize papal involvement in ecumenical prayer and discussion meetings, you'll have to dedicate your red pen to the histories of Popes John XIII, Paul VI, John Paul II and Benedict XVI as well, because they all participated in or convened similar meetings.

Did you mean John XXIII? If so, yes! All popes who invoked, participated, promulgated, supported, and continue to enforce the false teachings of Vatican II! I have been saying that this current crisis in the Church is not just a Francis problem, but a Vatican II Modernist problem.

49 posted on 11/19/2014 1:50:18 PM PST by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson