I read a portion of your patent documentation. Given its length, it may be more useful to me and others if you could summarize your ‘proposal’ in a couple of paragraphs, updated for the intervening fifteen years since your filing. It strikes me as much like cap and trade without the bad science surrounding the impact of CO2 emissions, with the proviso that I have only read a portion.
The problem with that is that the application takes many forms. Each time, when presented with simplicity, one expects backup. Then you're back to complexity. I've chased my tail and wasted many hours with posters educating them one at a time. I've got too much work these days to do that. So I suggest you go to the book out of which that patent came and take a look at the material there. The PCT application in particular is a better summary than the original disclosure.
It strikes me as much like cap and trade without the bad science surrounding the impact of CO2 emissions, with the proviso that I have only read a portion.
Trade but with no cap. This application actually predated the Bartels patent that became cap and raid. If anybody wanted to rub a couple of nickels toward it, it could at least cut off the licensing cash now going to Fannie Mae as prior art.