That's just it. I could suggest the same thing for you, while noting that you underlined a portion -- but provided no link, nor brought those guidelines.
There was no "linking to previous posts" from this forum, but a link to a thread outside this forum.
And that came after your having used a combination of particular imagery that dan has used on this forum -- which use of your own raised query from dan -- and your answer was to send him (and anyone following the conversation) offsite, in order to some how prove your own empty assertions.
Maybe I'm the one who is sick and tired of having to do all the work. So go fetch.
There was no "linking to previous posts" from this forum, but a link to a thread outside this forum.
Which is why I suggested you review the guidelines before you go accusing somebody of cross-threading again. It's not my problem some are ignorant. The guidelines are quite precise. I neither linked to a previous thread or to another poster's comments.
And that came after your having used a combination of particular imagery that dan has used on this forum -- which use of your own raised query from dan -- and your answer was to send him (and anyone following the conversation) offsite, in order to some how prove your own empty assertions.
And?