Really, and just where and how was this line of reasoning "brutally eviscerated by the Catholic Faithful?" Quite the opposite if anything. All i see is vain propagandic argument-by-assertion or links, logical fallacies and ad hominems by RC posters even less mature than here overall but the same RC line of reasoning being exposed as fallacious, as it always has been here.
See my exchange here and show me where it was at all refuted.
I saw the last tangled wreck of cross threading, supposition, assertions, logical fallacies, etc., all bundled up in a little filthy bag of poison, set on your own doorstep -- and wanted to kick it.
But since there was some smoldering flame-like thing going on with it too, it's best that I didn't.
I see you doused it with water, then swept it off with a shovel. Good job.
But just WOW.
I think that may have been one of the worst singular unjustified cases of cross-threading I have ever seen. It's one thing to link to example, and/or extended comments from elsewhere that are cogent to points which are under discussion -- it's quite another thing to do so as a baiting & tempting of individuals here, wherein one has to go fishing around first-- just to see what is being talked about, and then to try and make sense of it.
Not only was it dragging rabbit warren sort of low grade argument from another thread -- it was dragging it to this thread from OFF-SITE! ---even though we had a long thread on that very same subject/precise same article just recently here on FR.
There appears to have been a rash of cross-threading here of late, too. Not just a single cross-threading, but a series of the thread-to-thread badgering kind.
I just documented what portions of that case which were still visible before entire deletion, seeing the comments still extant on un-refreshed "comments" page -- while they otherwise went bye-bye on "thread" pages.... with the cross-thread badgering coming from a 'forum hero' of the one who is presently your here antagonist.
It must be like a radar-love kind of thing...their [ahem] spirits in accord?