Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: JPX2011
First of all if a straight-forward question is asked of me that is not replete with presuppositions, modifiers, qualifiers and an embedded anti-Catholic bias then that person will receive a straight-forward answer.

Man alive, if i applied that to the questions coming RCs, esp. so as to disallow embedded anti-Prot. bias (though one RC omnisciently declared there never has been any by a Cath. on FR) then i think hardly any would qualify!:)

3,094 posted on 10/22/2014 5:31:35 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3058 | View Replies ]


To: daniel1212
Man alive, if i applied that to the questions coming RCs, esp. so as to disallow embedded anti-Prot. bias (though one RC omnisciently declared there never has been any by a Cath. on FR) then i think hardly any would qualify!:)

Perhaps. But really what it comes to is intent, does it not? I suppose if one's sole interest is to play "gotcha" games then by necessity the interrogatories must conform to the game in order to reach the desired outcome.

Thus, the structure of the question is this:

In order to conceivably arrive at the this:

And of course when the individual has the question put to them goes "outside the lines" they are to be labeled an obfuscator or engaging in evasiveness. Whatever it takes to keep them within the confines of the game.

Which in reality is nothing more than this:

A trip through someone else's mind. A construct of their own making whereby the boundaries are ever-shifting

Through the rabbit hole. A dangerous proposition.

3,113 posted on 10/22/2014 11:08:10 PM PDT by JPX2011
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3094 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson