Man alive, if i applied that to the questions coming RCs, esp. so as to disallow embedded anti-Prot. bias (though one RC omnisciently declared there never has been any by a Cath. on FR) then i think hardly any would qualify!:)
Perhaps. But really what it comes to is intent, does it not? I suppose if one's sole interest is to play "gotcha" games then by necessity the interrogatories must conform to the game in order to reach the desired outcome.
Thus, the structure of the question is this:
In order to conceivably arrive at the this:
And of course when the individual has the question put to them goes "outside the lines" they are to be labeled an obfuscator or engaging in evasiveness. Whatever it takes to keep them within the confines of the game.
Which in reality is nothing more than this:
A trip through someone else's mind. A construct of their own making whereby the boundaries are ever-shifting
Through the rabbit hole. A dangerous proposition.