[JPX2011]

No you didn't. That's merely your idea of a cute response. Instead it is a somewhat bitter unprovable and uninformed accusation against me.

My response was succinct. And in that response there was much said. You made a generalization about a "lack of support" for Israel on the part of the Roman Catholic Church. A statement for which no proof was provided.

And unlike protestants, I do not think I can buy my way into Heaven by aligning myself with the State of Israel. Nor am I interested in pleasuring myself by divining the eschatology of same.

It has been observed previously that you do not respond to complete posts but rather to just words and phrases in FR posts. Less than honest and definitely non-persuasive.

I responded to your posts. You didn't like the answer you received. Not my problem.

[Resettozero]

My response was succinct.

No, you are inaccurate in your self-assessment.

You repeatedly evade direct questions and reply to what you were not asked...as leftists are trained to do. You know, regular bully tactics.

Would have been better if you'd passed giving your "response" and not replied disingenuously. There's more intellectual honesty in that.

You still are not making a convincing case for the RCC's validity as the one true church of Jesus Christ. Certainly not a compelling case.