He ought to spend some time first in reading the bible...
The modern Evangelical phrase, “Do you accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior?” has more in common with Muslim submission. For there need be no union implied in the question – many who have become Christians under the guise of this question have no perception of union whatsoever.
The saddest part of this hit piece on Christianity is that there are so many who will listen to this unGodly tripe, and believe it, without checking with what God says about it...
Luk_1:47 And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour.
Mary needed a Saviour...
Luk_2:11 For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord.
Joh_4:42 And said unto the woman, Now we believe, not because of thy saying: for we have heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world.
Jesus Christ was sent as the Saviour of the world but this moronic priest doesn't need one??? Do all those idiots teach this stuff...You'd better run away from them as fast as you can...
Mary needed a Savior, not a Restorer. Most of what Evangelical Christians mean by “savior” (one who prevents destruction) is actually alternately worded “restorer” (one who makes new again after partial destruction). Of course, the words are far from mutually exclusive: restoration is one way in which Christ saves us. But not all that has needed saving has necessarily needed restoring.