Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ronnietherocket3
I see no reason to believe it establishes the Sole Infallible Authority of Scripture.

How can you say that? What other transcendent Infallible Authority do see in Scripture? Do you see the words of ex cathedra statements as wholly inspired of God and the transcendent Infallible Authority thru the Bible since the giving of the Law? No you cannot.

I only see one question in post 825

It is basically one, but each presupposition can be dealt with as a question.

A better description is that they are stubborn children in need of compassion rather in rebellion against God.

They need compassion because they are wrong, as the preceding statements of the RC argument are correct?

Can you prove it is a tradition of men?

Indeed, since it is not a promise or a testimony of Mary found in Scripture, and Rome teaches it as a tradition, and its absence is contrary to the practice of the Holy Spirit who is care-full to provide such notable events, or promises. And her crowning is contrary to Scripture as no one will be crowned in Heaven till the Lord returns. (1Cor. 4:5; 2Tim. 4:1,8; Rev.11:18; Mt. 25:31-46; 1Pt. 1:7; 5:4)

968 posted on 09/29/2014 5:20:48 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 913 | View Replies ]


To: daniel1212
I see no reason to believe it establishes the Sole Infallible Authority of Scripture. How can you say that? What other transcendent Infallible Authority do see in Scripture? Do you see the words of ex cathedra statements as wholly inspired of God and the transcendent Infallible Authority thru the Bible since the giving of the Law? No you cannot. I only see one question in post 825 It is basically one, but each presupposition can be dealt with as a question. A better description is that they are stubborn children in need of compassion rather in rebellion against God. They need compassion because they are wrong, as the preceding statements of the RC argument are correct? Can you prove it is a tradition of men? Indeed, since it is not a promise or a testimony of Mary found in Scripture, and Rome teaches it as a tradition, and its absence is contrary to the practice of the Holy Spirit who is care-full to provide such notable events, or promises. And her crowning is contrary to Scripture as no one will be crowned in Heaven till the Lord returns. (1Cor. 4:5; 2Tim. 4:1,8; Rev.11:18; Mt. 25:31-46; 1Pt. 1:7; 5:4)

The entirety of this post starts off with the assumption that Sola Scriptura is true. I have seen no reason to believe that it is.
1,109 posted on 09/29/2014 8:47:52 PM PDT by ronnietherocket3 (Mary is understood by the heart, not study of scripture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 968 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson