Read the article of this thread so you may see what you missed.You posted this earlier on the thread:I did read the article
I know of no other dogma...regarding the Assumption than the one declared by Pope Pius XII in 1950.
That is what this thread is about.
Title: THE ASSUMPTION OF MARY: Condemned as Heretical by 2 Popes in the 5th and 6th Centuries
So here is the dilemma:
Catholicism has more than one view on the assumption of Mary.
Which popes are wrong, or is it blaspheme to declare a pope's (or two popes) dogma wrong?
It can't be both ways.
I believe in the Assumption
Of course. All Catholics must. Just as before 1950 they could not, as per TWO Catholic popes.
I was wondering when Mary became the center of the Catholic belief system, now I see it was 1950.
Although before that more than one pope declared that salvation could be received from Mary.
Besides the "fire of Mary's heart" converting souls.
I did post a link, but you didn’t want to click into it. That’s the only information I saw online. About the book on the Assumption! If you were interested in an answer (instead of working to discredit the Church, and I’m not mind-reading, it’s obvious), I’d ask my brother-in-law, an orthodox (saintly) priest, but I’m not going to bother him in this regard. He’d only suggest you go to adoration.