To: ronnietherocket3
Ultimately these threads come down to the question of Sola Scriptura vs. Catholicism. The question of whether the Assumption can be required is ultimately a question of whether the Catholic Church can define dogma. The question of whether one can believe Mary was assumed is ultimately a question of whether one needs proof (as opposed to evidence) of something prior to believing it. Americans are a little obsessed with the threshold of beyond reasonable doubt. OK, so why did the early popes declare the assumption of Mary to be heresy and now the later popes not only believe it, but make it dogma?
775 posted on
09/29/2014 12:31:04 AM PDT by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: metmom
OK, so why did the early popes declare the assumption of Mary to be heresy and now the later popes not only believe it, but make it dogma?
Where do any Popes state that it is heresy to believe the Assumption? Keep in mind this must be a condemnation specifically of the Assumption. If it is a condemnation of a group, that would mean the Church can't teach that Christ was crucified, as the Arians believed this (their problem was in denying the divinity of Christ).
814 posted on
09/29/2014 5:23:31 AM PDT by
ronnietherocket3
(Mary is understood by the heart, not study of scripture.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson