Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom

Indeed. Did you see the posts which admitted the apocryphal writings WERE the source of the doctrine? And then defended such by claiming some good doctrine can come from a condemned text? Unbelievable! Didn’t the church fathers argue and toil against heresies and then demand such texts be destroyed? Yet we have those who claim these fathers as doctors and saints but disregard their warnings of false doctrines.

Just thought I would point out this fallacious approach.


1,026 posted on 09/29/2014 7:04:14 PM PDT by redleghunter (But let your word 'yes be 'yes,' and your 'no be 'no.' Anything more than this is from the evil one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 777 | View Replies ]


To: redleghunter
It's a wonder that the fact that they use an admitted and previously condemned as heretical text to support a doctrine that is so critical to them and is incorporated into the CCC which they must adhere to at the risk of losing their salvation doesn't cause some of them to wonder just what is going on in their church.

Instead it's this:

All the while condemning US as heretics and mouth breathers.

1,038 posted on 09/29/2014 7:16:10 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1026 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson