Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: marshmallow

I read the entire Bible. I never saw the word “annulment” in it once. Perhaps I have an obsolete version.


3 posted on 09/22/2014 6:54:47 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker; Unam Sanctam; x_plus_one; Patton@Bastogne; Oldeconomybuyer; RightField; aposiopetic; ...

In the Religion forum, on a thread titled The Annulment Argument: a Quick Guide to the Two Sides, Lurker wrote:

I read the entire Bible. I never saw the word “annulment” in it once. Perhaps I have an obsolete version.

So what is the correct view? Never allow divorce? Never acknowledge fraudulent or mistaken weddings happen? Or some super secret jury that allows what you want?


5 posted on 09/22/2014 6:57:50 PM PDT by narses ( For the Son of man shall come ... and then will he render to every man according to his works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker
I read the entire Bible. I never saw the word “annulment” in it once. Perhaps I have an obsolete version.

you weren't paying attention and your sarcasm is evident......annulment means it didn't happen in the first place....thus no need to mention it specifically...

that, by the way, is different from a divorce which many people accept and which disolves, somehow, a God oriented marriage....PATHETIC.

12 posted on 09/22/2014 8:26:47 PM PDT by terycarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson