“You can’t get away from it, AMPU. Open up your Bible. “Matthew,” “Mark, “Luke” and “John” ascribed to Gospels which were written anonymously. Not attributed to any human evangelist in the text itself. Do you object to that? It’s added on.”
Chapter numbers, page numbers, verse numbers, even many book names are added on later as matters of convenience.
They do not add to the truth of the book. They do not change the God’s Word.
That's a very mistaken assertion. The attribution of the Gospels to two of the Twelve Apostles (Matthew and John) stems from a tradition of the Church that the Gospels came from authentic, eye-witness sources who accompanied Jesus for the 2 1/2 years of His pulic ministry, and especially, from those who witnessed his post-Resurrection glory: t from the very Apostles to whom Christ gave such glorious privileges sand promises. It has an impact on whether we think they are genuine or spurious; whether we think the Apostolic tradition is authoritative, or it is not. It was, after all, only a couple of centuries after that that the 27 books of the New Testament were collected from hither and thither, and recognized as a unified Canon of sacred writings.
And two Gospels are attributed -- again, not by stated authorship in the text, but by Church tradition --- to two of the Apostles' disciples. Mark is secretary-disciple for Peter; and as for Luke, it's only according to a Church tradition dating from the 2nd century that the Luke named as a companion of Paul in three of the letters attributed to Paul himself, was the same man who was the author of Luke-Acts.
The impact of this on belief cannot be overstated. If the early Church hadn't believed that these books came from eyewitnesses and their first-generation disciples, the books would not have been accepted into the Canon.