If the King James version came out after the Catholic version, and it is not the same, doesn’t that mean that the King James version must be incomplete and thus inaccurate?
They made a new translation because previous translations were inaccurate...They did just the opposite of what you claim...
The books of the Apocrypha are excluded in the KJB, but that doesn't mean it is incomplete or incorrect.
There is nothing to prevent one from reading the books of the Apocrypha or the Pseudepigrapha.
I have a two volume set of the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha on my bedside table and study the Book of Enoch regularly.
Fascinating stuff.