I am finding information which suggests King James 1 was straight, and that one of his ex-courtiers, a chap named Antihony Weldon, was the principle source for these defamatory attacks, out of some sort of political grudge, which would explain why no one at the time took it seriously. Can you share your source?
http://www.ministers-best-friend.com/King-James-Homosexual.html
http://rictornorton.co.uk/kingjame.htm
No sense in posting anymore about King James’ sexuality. I thought it was a well established fact that King James was homosexual, or bisexual if you can believe he fathered 7 children. Maybe he was as straight as an arrow and those ugly rumors were started by those that are not fans of the KJB.
Oh yes, more sources that would be blithely dismissed if they were ever invoked against Rome. The first states,
So dedicated are we to the task of "Empowering" Ministers world-wide, that we "Ordain the Doctorate of Divinity" upon all who qualify without charging a single cent . . . without even asking a love-offering!
And in its diatribe against King James, it quotes two non-existent web pages, then none at all, then sodomite (with his partner David Allen) Rick Norton for the rest, " author of The Great Queers of History. And after seeing what such imagine descriptions in the Bible say, invoking him is a negative argument.
And which is who the second link is to. Remember this next time an RC rejects any source that impugns Rome. No bigotry here.