Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: redleghunter

re: JW’s. I am getting at when I speak with them, they use the fact the word “Trinity” is not found in the Bible as proof the Trinity is false. I was comparing this to your seeming using the same tactic by asking how many times we fin the word “church” after Revelation 3. we don’t need to find the word if we find the church, as in the description of the two witnesses can only be the church.


92 posted on 08/21/2014 6:18:48 PM PDT by one Lord one faith one baptism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: one Lord one faith one baptism; af_vet_1981
re: JW’s. I am getting at when I speak with them, they use the fact the word “Trinity” is not found in the Bible as proof the Trinity is false. I was comparing this to your seeming using the same tactic by asking how many times we fin the word “church” after Revelation 3. we don’t need to find the word if we find the church, as in the description of the two witnesses can only be the church.

Oranges and pecans as Fr. Sullivan my Jesuit debate teacher would say. Why? Because in one book, Revelation, specific terms and words are used. Did I seem dogmatic in my statements? No I said it was curious.

I will surely ping you when the Prots and Evangelicals debate the FRJWs on the Trinity and Deity of Jesus Christ. The only Catholics who show up to those discussions seems to be Salvation and the gentleman pinged above.

114 posted on 08/21/2014 7:52:44 PM PDT by redleghunter (But let your word 'yes be 'yes,' and your 'no be 'no.' Anything more than this is from the evil one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson