“But that is not all that is involved. We know that the life of the mind also comes into play. To flirt with private lusts, even though not acted out, is just as wicked.”
So, where, exactly does she say say sins-of-the-mind are OK?
“Additionally, affirming others who do choose to act out their homosexual proclivities is equally as damnable.”
Given that she teaches that sodomy is against the God’s law, how, exactly, is she is “affirming others who do choose to act out their homosexual proclivities.”
+++++
Seriously, I swear Freepers would have stone the heck out of that harlot, punched Jesus in the face for having long hair and being a Jew.
It’s “go and sin no more.”
It’s not “never have sinned, ever.”
I wish I was as perfect as most Freepers.
Then I wouldn’t need Christ.
As it is, I am an imperfect sinner, who does his best with Christ’s help and am slowly getting better.
...
Given that she teaches that sodomy is against the God’s law, how, exactly, is she is “affirming others who do choose to act out their homosexual proclivities.”
I don't see where she teaches and affirms that it is against God's law. You have to read between the lines... in this case, the silences. Failing, within the context of the discussion of homosexuality, to somewhere condemn that act, the propensity, as a perversion of what God intended is as good as silence in the face of murder. It is tantamount to silent assent.
It would not surprise me one bit, once this new "accepting" mentality embeds itself further in her local church body, if she suddenly "comes out" again as a sexually active lesbian, and demands that her church "marry" her and her lover. And then she'll go to the geh press and give them her sob story of how the church she grew up in and accepted her is now denying her this "right," with the motive to incite hatred toward Christians. This is happening all the time now.
Well said, bro.